#IMAGECAST VOTING MACHINE COMPROMISED CODE#
One of the most serious vulnerabilities could allow malicious code to be spread from the election management system to machines throughout a jurisdiction, Halderman said. “These vulnerabilities, for the most part, are not ones that could be easily exploited by someone who walks in off the street, but they are things that we should worry could be exploited by sophisticated attackers, such as hostile nation states, or by election insiders, and they would carry very serious consequences,” Halderman told the AP. He and many other election security experts have insisted that using hand-marked paper ballots is the most secure method of voting and the only option that allows for meaningful post-election audits.
Halderman has long argued that using digital technology to record votes is dangerous because computers are inherently vulnerable to hacking and thus require multiple safeguards that aren’t uniformly followed. Those measures need to be applied ahead of every election, the advisory says, and it’s clear that’s not happening in all of the states that use the machines. It urges prompt mitigation measures, including both continued and enhanced “defensive measures to reduce the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities.” Yet the advisory seems to suggest states aren’t doing enough. The advisory, obtained by the Associated Press in advance of its expected Friday release, details nine vulnerabilities and suggests protective measures to prevent or detect their exploitation.ĬISA Executive Director Brandon Wales said in a statement that “states’ standard election security procedures would detect exploitation of these vulnerabilities and in many cases would prevent attempts entirely.”
The touchscreen voting machines can be configured as ballot-marking devices that produce a paper ballot or record votes electronically. Alex Halderman, who wrote the report on which the advisory is based, said he was looking for ways Dominion’s Democracy Suite ImageCast X voting system could be compromised. University of Michigan computer scientist J. The new advisory is based on testing by a prominent computer scientist and expert witness in a long-running lawsuit that is not directly related to the allegations of the stolen 2020 election, although it would appear to substantiate some of the concerns previously dismissed by partisan media and government officials. Of that I have no doubt.”įull Senate hearing video: /7hzf1jGzE0 history…while elections are sometimes messy, this was a secure election. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, cast a new light on the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment that came under sever scrutiny in the aftermath of the 2020 election, amid reports of the company’s partisan ties to radical leftist groups both domestic and abroad.ĬISA’s then head, Chris Krebs resigned from the Trump administration after leveling insubordinate and unprofessional attacks on President Donald Trump and others via social media, including his baseless claim that it was the “most secure” election in US history, which many in the leftist media echoed mindlessly.įormer Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency Director Chris Krebs: “The 2020 election was the most secure in U.S.
#IMAGECAST VOTING MACHINE COMPROMISED SOFTWARE#
( Headline USA) Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.
0 kommentar(er)
